What makes a good ratio?

The most famous of all stories is the all stories of the cave, comparing Plato to a prisoner who spent his whole life in the cave but can’t imagine a world beyond that.

How exactly does all talk work? All stories (Greek, “talking about something else”) are, for example, myths, or a complete and cohesive story of George Orwell Animal Farmit seems to be about one thing, but in fact it’s another. Or, to put it differently, it is a story with two (or more) meanings: superficial, literal meaning, and deeper, more subtle meaning.

One way to understand all stories is to understand smaller ones, as all stories are often referred to as “expanded ratio phors.” While all stories are complete stories, and in fact they are complete stories that appear to be different things, the Philor is a sentence or short segment that equates with two seemingly unrelated things. for example:

I am Sharon’s rose and the lily of the valley. So is my love between my daughters as the lilies between the thorns.

The first sentence consists of two minor phors (“I am Sharon’s Rose” and “I am the lily of the Valley”), and the second sentence consists of a direct mile.

Biphor, direct mile and analogy

What is the difference between a phir and a direct mile? In two words, not so much. Meanwhile, Hiphor says that teeth Something else, direct mile says so Like or As Something else.

A direct mile may be considered a type of paraphor, for example, as involving drawing comparisons for the purposes of explaining or clarifying an idea, for example, as in parallel with “scientists blind their paradigms just like fish.”

In fact, the second sentence from the passage I quoted (“so is my love between my daughters, as a lily between the barbs”) is aptly similarity than a simple direct mile.

Philosopher, direct mile, and analogy are the numbers of speech, and are types of rhetorical devices (called depending on the context, literature, or poetic device).

Why is metaphor special?

Well, here are the points I drive: Unlike other rhetorical devices such as concurrent and resonance, metaphors are not merely decorative, but cognitively respectable ways of knowledge.

Metaphors and their subtypes allow you to grasp abstract or unfamiliar ideas from the perspective of something more specific or familiar. Furthermore, the superposition or juxtaposition of two superficially different ideas elicit hidden or quadratic correspondence between the two. This is not the formal acting logic. This is about getting two ideas to marry a third, and in reality it’s much more common.

Logicists and their students prefer to focus on deductions and induction, but it is possible that the often overlooked ratiophor is the main form of human reasoning.

In Aristotle’s words:

Certainly, using poetic forms properly is wonderful, like compounds and strange words. But the greatest thing is to become a master of Philosopher. That’s one thing you can’t learn from others. And it’s also a sign of genius. This is because a good ratiophor suggests an intuitive perception of dissimilar similarity.

What makes a good ratio

The power of Philor depends, in some way, on its freshness and originality.

If the Philosopher is worn out, it becomes a cliché and some Philosophers are very tired so they are no longer visualized or considered Philosophers. For example, in English (as opposed to Spanish) we tend to talk about time in terms of space and distance, even if we don’t realize that “I’m not long,” “Let’s look at the weather for the next week,” or “Let’s catch up with him.” Metaphors like these, which are no longer visualized, are called dead metaphors, and language is full of them. Certainly, we can make the argument that all languages are onomatopoeic (or imitation of “cough”, “splash”, “thud”, etc.) or phoric. The word “metaphor” is itself a minor phor, as the Greeks are derived from “carryover.”

This is a similarity, or undoubtedly, by Joseph Campbell. Hero with a thousand faces:

I’ve bought this amazing machine – a computer. To me it seems like a god in the Old Testament, without many rules and mercy.

Unlike tired or dead metaphors, such fresh and vibrant metaphors are experienced as beautiful and enjoyable. They are very concise and condensed so they are beautiful. Because, like the humor they often include, they exercise our cognitive range and flexibility. And, like humor, they’re a bit playful, a bit naughty, a bit dangerous.

Again, in Aristotle’s words:

Easy to learn is naturally comfortable for all people, and the words mean something. So any word that creates knowledge for us is the most enjoyable.

Extended metaphors: all stories and personification

Now, back to all the topics. Like Philosopher, this all story helps to convey abstract and sometimes destructive ideas in more concrete and condensed forms, which symbolize ideas and can be easily revealed, hidden or explored.

This is known as personification when an abstract concept is given the form of a person or animation existence. Narcissism, for example, is an anthropomorphism of vanity and self-absorption, and is a hub-harrasing Icarus. Mahabharata, iliad We present Indian (though much longer), Bhima (Brute Force, Ego, Desire), Yudhishthira (Rigid Moral Law, Deontology), and Arjuna (three approaches to moral issues anthropomorphized by virtues). ethicsmoral uncertainty), those who shake the path between their two brothers’ paths are forced to make difficult and existential choices.

An important advantage of this all-talk is that it can be approached at multiple levels. This means that people enjoy it on many levels, bend all the stories to the curves, or bend the twists of their minds, just as they want to see, or whatever they actually want to see.