Movement problems and habits learned

Moshefeldenkrais was born in Ukraine in 1904 and was part of the Russian Empire at the time. Three major influences shaped the life of Feldenkrais: soccer, judo, and his studies of physics. His soccer Career Finished due to a knee injury. He recovered, but Feldenkrais continued to experience persistent pain afterwards. As a result of this situation, Feldenkrais ultimately developed a unique way of movement education It is designed to enhance physical healing.

Decades later, psychiatrist and author Norman Doydge introduced Feldenkrais’s healing methods to a wider audience through his bestselling book. It itself changes brain and How to heal the brain. In particular, in relation to physical injuries, our contributions can be persuaded to provide valuable and hopeful insights into how we learn, adapt and recover.

This physical Treatment The perspective came from his judo training and education, according to Doidge (2015), who cites Feldenkrais. During his judo teaching, Feldenkrais discovered it for the students he worked with, in connection with pain management“The difficulty was caused by how their brains do I learned to adapt to structural abnormalities, like the abnormalities themselves (Doidge, 2015, p. 176, italics in Original). Feldenkrais slowly focused on specific movements as judo students strive for the success they are aiming for.

According to Doidge (2015, p. 176), Feldenkrais had the view that “(M)OST traditional treatments assume that function is entirely dependent on the “fundamental” body structure and its limitations.” This has led Feldenkrais to establish the principles of the Feldenkrais method with the following title: “Many movement problems, and the pain that suits them, are caused by habits learned, not by abnormal structures.”

Goju Karate Training and Education

The focus on slow, specific movements was positively compared to what happened in my own Goju Karate training and education.

The same principles of slow, technology-specific movements were applied in relation to complex brain-based multimovement therapy with John Famekon. According to Coyle (2009, p. 85), as sports science research points out, “Latening helps practitioners develop something important: practical recognition of the internal blueprint of skills – the shape and rhythm of interlocking skill circuits.”

Debilitating effect of muscle tension

According to Feldenkrais (Doidge (2015) pointed out, muscle tone, which could also be described as persistent involuntary stiffness, prevents spontaneous movement from occurring. As Feldenkrais (2015) pointed out, this persistent intolerant, acid-hardened muscle tone occurs.

As Doidge (2015) points out, due to this brain-based neurological inability, large muscle groups simultaneously fire and contract. As a result, these adjacent muscle contractions cause muscle stiffness and prevent spontaneous movements from occurring (Doidge, 2015).

Self-initiated spontaneous physical exercise

To remedy this, Doidge (2015) states that Feldenkrais is the opinion that it is a “physical instruction program,” that is, a self-initiated physical movement that cites Feldenkrais according to Doidge. According to Doidge (2015), this leads to a situation in which current adjacent muscle contractions that lead to muscle stiffness no longer occur.

According to Doidge (2015), to achieve this, citing Feldenkrais, Feldenkrais participated in a wide variety of processes in which patients were included, but not limited to: (a) It is completely stationary. (b) Use only Visualization; (c) Move only unaffected limbs, or only those that Feldenkrais often mentioned. As unseparated limbs, Not the limbs that are suffering. (d) Have the patient engage in a near-perceptible micromovement of the suffering limbs (Doidge, 2015).

Functional integration

Furthermore, Doidge (2015) points out that Feldenkrais advised everyone Not interested in what may be considered negative thoughts. In the course of movement, if muscle tension, i.e., involuntary muscle stiffness – returns, Doidge (2015, p. 177) states that Feldenkrais points out what the individual has directed to the individual. do not have “Attempt to “push” the limit or “fix” the error.”

According to Doidge (2015, p. 177), citing Feldenkrais was that he needed what he needed. With intentional, excellent focused deliberations, “To explore different types of movements, to see which one seemed most efficient and elegant.”

According to Doidge (2015), all of this was citing Feldenkrais. Not judged. It was all about finding ways to help “help the brain” Brain, mind, body When creating a new brain map. According to Doidge, it will result in potentially seamless and efficient segmented segmentation and/or overall movement (Doidge, 2015).

Brain map

In relation to brain maps, Doidge (2015) notifies that “there is the brain map (are) controls.” competition For the principles with valuable resources Use it or lose it” (Doidge, 2010, p. 59, original italics). Doidge (2010, p. 59, 46), Merzenich et al. (1983) found that “when we were to assign brain processing power,” that the brain always allocates “neurological resources” to the most active part of the brain.

This hypothesis was established, and Doidge (2015, cited by Feldenkrais) pointed out that Feldenkrais had adjusted his intellectual advancement. Brain and body Scenario here Brain, mind, body It operates as a single integrated, comprehensive neurobiological unit. According to Doidge (2015), Feldenkrais reported that this adjusted, this adjusted application. Overall brain and body processes It will potentially lead to healing success. As mentioned above, this has become known as functional integration.

Functional integration is all but judgement

Again, this process Functional integration It’s all about finding non-judgment and how to help brain I’ll support you Mind and bodyallowing the brain to create new brain maps that lead to seamless and efficient movement. this Non-judgmental movement process He played a constant role in the application of complex brain-based multimovement therapy with former world featherweight champion John Famekon.

Event Horizon

When John went from simple movements to complex brain-based multimovements, my hypothesis was that this movement-based rehabilitation process (without evidence) would further enhance John’s physical, mental and emotional abilities. This reinforcement continued gradually until these consecutive, complex movements reached what became the “horizon of events” situation.

An “event horizon” condition refers to a state in which movement sequences cannot be accurately performed, regardless of complexity from a thought-action perspective. The process and purpose of event horizon is intentionally requested in a comprehensive sense. The ultimate goal of the event horizon process is to achieve holistic, complex, and successful brain body integration, thereby expanding the possibilities for overall movement.

In addition to this, we hypothesized that the “event horizon” process leads to the greatest possible neuromuscular potential. Although there was no evidence to support this hypothesis, it suggests that John’s almost normal, ultimate recovery, along with this complex brain-based multimovement therapy and the associated “event horizon” process, can be described as an empirically evidence-based, successful brain therapy, particularly in response to the context of acquired brain damage.

If you don’t try it, nothing will happen

However, it is important to note that there was never a guarantee that this result would occur. Still, my thoughts were based on the assumption that nothing would happen if you didn’t try. This is exactly what I explained to John and Glenny when we first met on December 11th, 1993. With this in mind, on December 18, 1993 (with the approval of John and Glenny), I began to apply what marked the beginning of complex brain-based multimovement therapy.