Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
There is debate as to when white matter was first identified and named. He is now known as Glia, as pointed out by Koob (2009). Greek is the word glue. In some studies, Rudolf Virchow, a German physician, biologist, pathologist and anthropologist, explained the white matter when studying the brain ventricle. Virchow has also been praised for the term “Neuroglia.”
The naming of white matter as neuroglia may have occurred as early as 1846. However, there are also suggestions that the naming may have become official between 1854 and 1856 (Chvátal & Verkhratsky, 2018; Tandon, 2022). However, Parpura et al. (2012, NP) informed in 1858 that “(n)Euglia was initially described by Rudolf Warkou as a connective tissue that binds nervous elements.”
Furthermore, this study also shows that Virchow observed that ”
The parenchyma is a functional part of the brain, and may have been named glia, including neurons and white matter. Neurons and white matter are involved Cognition and body control. On the other hand, stroma is not directly involved in cognition or body managementHowever, its role is essential for smooth brain and body functioning (Crisan & Benbadis, 2013; Rieske, Azizi, Augelli, Gaughan, & Krynska, 2007).
Stromas support the brain through structural and operational mechanisms in the form of blood vessels and anonymous connective tissue. All of these provide structural support, oxygen and nutrients to the brain. All of this was described as essential for the brain to function optimally and seamlessly. This could have been the white matter of the brain, written by Virchow at this point and named Gria (Rieske, Azizi, Augelli, Gaughan & Krynska, 2007).
White matter discovery, analysis, naming naming
However, there is another view that Greer’s discovery and naming could have been officially occurring in 1856. Ndubakuand De Bellard (2008, p. 183) reports that “It was Virchow that coined the term. Neuro-glia (Nerve-cement)” Publication in 1856 Cytopathology.
However, some studies suggest that previous anatomical observations by Robert Remack and Heinrich Muller had a major impact on this study related to this brain-based substance in the “white matter.” This study suggests that while the 1830s have already been described in non-neurological problems, namely white matter, peripheral nerves, Muller identifies radial glial elements in the retina (now known as Muller cells), highlighting structures that are neither nerve nor vascular. These observations, although not fully understood at the time, have laid the essential foundation for later classification of glia as distinct cellular entities (Chvátal & Verkhratsky, 2018; Tandon, 2022).
In his study, Tandon (2022) confirms the importance of these early contributions, highlighting that Virchow’s formal naming of Neuroglia is an important step in distinguishing glial cells from neurons, despite the fact that glial true cellularity became apparent in the decades that follow. That is, the mid-19th century (dates are identified as 1846, 1854, 1856, 1858). Although this study at this time shows the formal emergence of neuroscience, as mentioned earlier, its conceptual research leads further to the pioneering insights of Remak and Müller (Tandon, 2022).
Research also suggests that German anatomist, scientist and researcher Heinrich Muller reportedly discovered “supportive” neurosis in the retina. This study tells Muller created a completed drawing in 1851 (Marmor & Martin, 1978). Nevertheless, Ndubaku and De Bellard (2008) also notified that Müller’s study and drawings of retinal neurosis were presented in 1856. It’s the same year that Virchow was released. Cytopathology. However, regardless of social and research complexity, Virchow is believed to have been named white matter glia.
Essential reading of neuroscience
Karl Bergmann, Otto Deiters, Jacob Henle, Friedrich Merkel
In his 1857 study of the cerebellum, German biologist Carl Bergmann found and named a particular glial cell that now bears his name (Verkhratsky & Nedergaard, 2018). In the late 19th century, German neuroanatologist Otto Dieters presented what is considered to be the first image of what is now known as astrocytes (chovrea, & Boşca, 2013). A few years later, this study of astrocytes was extended by German physician, pathologist and anatomist Jacob Henle and his son-in-law, Friedrich Merkel.
Alexander Bain
Philosopher Alexander Bain argued that thought, movement, physical aptitude and habits lead to “specific groupings or adjustments of sensations and movement thanks to the specific growth of cell junctions” (Greenfield, 2014, p. 57).
The first formal laboratory in psychology
The first formal psychology laboratory was founded in 1879. German philosopher William Wand (who also had a medical degree) established what was considered to be “the first formal laboratory of the University of Leipzig in 1879” (Rosenzweig, 2007, p. 5).
This new laboratory study involves the brain, behavior, thoughts, and Memory. This interest in the brain, thoughts, memories, behavior, and now psychology followed with French psychologist Theodore Libott. Memory illness 1881 (Rosenzweig, 2007).
This book is considered important as it observed a direct experimental link that confirms the relationship between brain lesions and physiology associated with brain disease (Rosenzweig, 2007).
Kamilogorji
Another advancement related to the centre Nervous system It occurred in 1880 when Italian doctor, pathologist and scientist Kami Logorgi examined neurons, vesicles and granules. The discovery of the Golgi led to what is now known as the Golgi device, the Golgi complex, “Golgi tendon spindle or Golgi tendon organ” (Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2015, NP). The Golgi published his findings in 1883 (Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2015).
Hermann Ebbin House
Next, it was German psychologist Hermann Ebbinhaus who expanded the research and knowledge base of brain-memory connections. On memory 1885. Ebbin House is committed to studying how memory can be measured in what is considered a “pass breakbook” about the brain (Rosenzweig, 2007, p. 5). Ebbinghaus’ view led others to investigate how the brain affects behavior, memory, and learning (Rosenzweig, 2007).
Flexible brain of 1890
William James writes in his book Psychology Principles In 1890, he formulated the hypothesis that memory, habits, learning, and behavior all resulted in the “physiological properties of the brain” (Rosenzweig, 2007, p. 6).
James didn’t know what these physiological properties of the brain were, but he had the view that the brain was the “head” and “director” of memory, learning, habits and behavior. This led to theorizing that James is It’s flexible and flexible. James argued that neural activity in the brain can “deepen old pathways… create new pathways” (Rosenzweig, 2007, p. 6).
